Mango DAT / Cube: a layered fee stack, broad discretionary authority and a currentness question.
Mangoceuticals' December 2025 Cube arrangement is useful because a single provider relationship combines platform access, client-controlled wallets, discretionary Solana management, tiered AUC charges, execution-management economics and short renewal periods.
Agreement snapshot
| Field | Publicly disclosed term |
|---|---|
| Effective date | December 17, 2025 |
| Client / provider | Mango DAT, LLC / Cube Operations LLC |
| Role | Platform and MPC-wallet services plus discretionary asset management over designated Account Assets, initially Solana |
| Authority | Cube has sole discretionary asset-management authority over Account Assets, including buying, selling, swapping, staking and other trading actions; wallets are disclosed as client-controlled with trade-only access for Cube |
| AUC fee tiers | 30 bps for the first tier below $10m; 25 bps for $10m–$50m; 20 bps for $50m–$250m; 10 bps above $250m, calculated on a graduated basis |
| Execution management | Order Form states 2% of total assets billed on initial deposit and then quarterly based on 30-day average NAV |
| Minimum | $2,500 monthly minimum |
| Expenses | Reasonable documented account expenses, including service-provider, settlement, tax, structuring and trading/account-management costs |
| Initial term | One year |
| Renewal | Automatic consecutive two-month periods unless either party gives at least 30 days' prior notice |
The fee architecture is not one percentage
The filed Order Form separates graduated AUC charges from a separate execution-management charge and a monthly minimum. That is exactly the kind of structure that disappears in a simple “management fee” spreadsheet.
A useful benchmark has to identify which charge applies to custody/platform scope, which charge applies to discretionary execution, whether the bases overlap and which expenses remain pass-throughs.
The authority is broad, but custody control is distinct
The Master Services Agreement gives Cube discretionary authority to transact in the Account Assets and appoints it as agent and attorney-in-fact for the management mandate. At the same time, the agreement states that permitted cryptocurrency wallets are controlled by the client and Cube has trade-only access.
This distinction matters because asset-management authority, wallet control, custody and platform services are separate comparison fields.
The exit structure is comparatively short-cycle
The Master Services Agreement has a one-year initial term followed by two-month automatic renewals. Either party can prevent the next renewal with at least 30 days' notice. The agreement also includes material-breach termination after a 30-day cure period and requires the client to remove assets after termination.
That makes Mango / Cube useful as a structural contrast to long-duration arrangements such as Upexi / GSR or AVAX One / Hivemind.
Currentness is the important unresolved field
The December 2025 8-K and filed exhibits establish the contract terms. Mangoceuticals' June 30, 2026 Form 10-Q, filed in August 2026, does not repeat references to Cube, Mango DAT, Solana or the digital-asset treasury program. Absence from that filing does not prove termination, but it also does not establish continued active deployment.
For a live client decision, the correct status is therefore currentness requires confirmation, not “active” by assumption.
Primary public sources
Mangoceuticals December 19, 2025 Form 8-K
Mango DAT / Cube Master Services Agreement
Mango DAT / Cube Order Form
Mangoceuticals Form 10-Q for June 30, 2026
Related research
Compare public DAT management agreements →
Digital asset treasury management agreements →
DAT provider fees →
DAT provider exit economics →
Public-source factual commercial research only. No legal, fairness, fiduciary, accounting or investment opinion and no recommendation concerning any provider.