Case note · Enlivex / Elinnovation

Enlivex / Elinnovation: a 2% treasury-value fee with a first-anniversary exit window and a financing-linked amendment.

Enlivex's RAIN-focused treasury arrangement is a useful public comparator because the issuer discloses a broad digital-asset management mandate, a 2% annual fee, a three-year initial term, a defined ordinary exit window and a later amendment that brought a financing counterparty into the account-control structure.

Agreement snapshot

FieldPublicly disclosed term
Effective dateNovember 20, 2025
ProviderElinnovation Labs Ltd.
RoleDigital-asset management for designated offering proceeds and other capital, principally under a RAIN-focused crypto strategy including staking / restaking / liquid staking where available
Management feeGenerally 2% per year of total treasury value, calculated daily
Custody / controlAccount assets remain in company-controlled accounts / wallets; the manager operates subject to investment guidelines, restricted-access and company instruction / approval controls
Initial termThree years
Ordinary terminationBeginning on the first anniversary, either party may terminate for any reason with at least 30 days' prior written notice
Cause terminationCompany: at least 30 days' notice; manager: at least 60 days' notice, with separate accelerated rights for specified legal / regulatory conditions
2026 amendmentMarch 23, 2026 joinder / amendment added Lind Global Asset Management XIV LLC and granted financing-linked rights over specified digital-asset collateral

A 2% fee is only comparable after the mandate is normalized

The public agreement gives Elinnovation responsibility and authority to execute the crypto strategy within the Investment Guidelines and allows activity including buying, selling, swapping, staking and selecting service providers, while company-side approval and wallet-control restrictions remain in place.

That means the 2% rate should be compared against other managed-treasury mandates with similar operating scope — not automatically against narrow strategic-advisory, custody-only or software arrangements.

The exit path is materially different from the long-duration cases

The initial term is three years, but the contract opens a no-cause termination path after the first anniversary with 30 days' notice. That structure is a useful control against public agreements where ordinary company-side exit is much more restricted or tied to larger remaining-term economics.

Benchmarking implication: annual rate + initial duration + earliest ordinary exit window should be shown together. A 2% fee with a first-anniversary exit path is not economically equivalent to a lower rate embedded in a ten- or twenty-year lock-in structure.

The March 2026 financing changed the control stack without replacing the manager

In March 2026, Enlivex entered a financing with Lind Global Asset Management XIV LLC and amended the Asset Management Agreement so Lind received specified rights over collateral that included portions of the digital-asset portfolio. The manager remained part of that amended control structure.

This is a useful reminder that provider currentness is not binary. A manager agreement can remain active while financing, security or account-control rights materially change around it.

Latest issuer disclosure keeps the manager relationship economically relevant

Enlivex's 2025 annual report, filed in 2026, continued to describe Elinnovation as the asset manager and the 2% fee structure, and disclosed the March 2026 amendment. That later-period disclosure is the correct starting point for a currentness reconstruction rather than the original November 2025 exhibit alone.

Related research

Compare public DAT management agreements →
Digital asset treasury provider fees →
DAT provider exit economics →
Board / CFO decision review →

Public-source factual commercial research only. No legal, fairness, fiduciary, accounting or investment opinion and no recommendation concerning any provider, financing or transaction.

See the $4,900 / 72-hour stress test