Case note · VisionWave / CTMG

VisionWave / CTMG: why a DAT provider fee can be 17 BTC instead of an AUM percentage.

VisionWave Holdings' agreement with Crypto Treasury Management Group is a useful public control against fee tables that assume every treasury provider is paid as a percentage of assets. The disclosed stack combines a cash retainer, a 17 BTC success fee, common-stock compensation, expenses and a two-year advisory term.

Agreement snapshot

FieldPublicly disclosed term
Effective dateSeptember 24, 2025; finalized and disclosed September 26, 2025
ProviderCrypto Treasury Management Group, LLC (CTMG)
RoleStrategic and advisory support for a digital asset treasury, including allocation, custody selection, treasury formation, staking design and digital-asset integration
Contemplated capital structureUp to $300 million, subject to company approval and transaction execution
Retainer$50,000 at signing; increases to $100,000 if binding definitive agreements are executed or capital / crypto assets are successfully deployed under the stated conditions
Success fee17 BTC or cash equivalent after the company's initial acquisition and custody of at least $20 million of digital assets under the contemplated treasury transaction
Equity compensation250,000 common shares upon and subject to closing of the crypto treasury transaction
Initial termTwo years
Convenience terminationEither party may terminate on 60 days' written notice, subject to the disclosed mutual-release provision

The success fee creates a different benchmarking problem

A 17 BTC success fee cannot be normalized by simply placing it next to a 0.6%, 1.25% or 1.75% annual AUM fee. Its dollar value changes with Bitcoin's market price, and the trigger depends on a defined transaction event rather than recurring account size.

Benchmarking implication: normalize the compensation trigger before normalizing the amount. Retainers, transaction-success fees, recurring AUM fees, performance fees and equity grants belong in separate economic fields before they are combined into a total exposure view.

The equity and staking provisions add another layer

The agreement also provides 250,000 shares upon closing and allows CTMG, with company approval, to direct staked assets to a validator of its choice, including a validator in which CTMG may have a financial interest, subject to disclosed conflict and waiver mechanics.

Those terms are not equivalent to a recurring manager fee, but they are part of the provider economics and governance record. Ignoring them would understate the commercial structure.

The exit structure is comparatively flexible — but earned economics still matter

Either party can terminate for convenience with 60 days' notice. The agreement separately states that fees due as of termination are considered earned under the stated conditions, while stock or warrant issuances included in the fees are subject to pro-rata adjustment based on services completed. It also requires final records transfer and, if applicable, unstaking coordination after termination.

Currentness should not be inferred from the original exhibit

The original 2025 agreement remains incorporated in VisionWave's public filing record. VisionWave's June 30, 2026 Form 10-Q, filed August 19, 2026, still lists the CTMG agreement in its exhibit index, but the existence of that incorporated exhibit does not by itself prove that the contemplated treasury transaction closed, that the 17 BTC success fee was earned, or that the relationship remains operationally active.

For a live decision, those status questions require a fresh currentness check rather than an assumption based on the original contract.

Related research

Digital asset treasury provider fees →
Management and adviser agreements →
Board / CFO decision review →
Digital asset treasury companies →

Public-source factual commercial research only. No legal, fairness, fiduciary, accounting or investment opinion and no recommendation concerning any provider or transaction.

See the $4,900 / 72-hour stress test