When a DAT Provider Economics Stress Test is useful.
The product is not intended for every digital-asset treasury relationship. It is most useful when provider economics are material and a Board, Audit Committee, CFO / finance team or counsel needs a defensible public-source record before a decision, challenge or exit.
New manager or adviser agreement
Compare fee, scope, term, termination rights, equity consideration and related-party facts before the arrangement is approved or closed.
Economics or scope changes
Re-benchmark when a fee tier, service scope, warrant package, success fee, term or termination provision changes.
Material recurring compensation
Refresh the public peer set when large recurring fees or related-party payments continue while the market or provider role evolves.
Activist or shareholder scrutiny
Separate a persuasive narrative from what public comparables actually support, including facts that cut against either side.
Counterterms need a market record
Translate public comparables into a factual record around fee, performance economics, duration and exit structure.
Termination economics become material
Benchmark lock-in, notice, acceleration and liquidated-damages structures, plus public outcomes and transition-control signals from similar arrangements.
Opportunity gate
We prioritize matters where the economics at risk are material: significant recurring fees, equity or warrant consideration, transaction-success fees, large termination exposure, or a live governance / activist / renegotiation / litigation event. A related-party label by itself is not enough.
See observed public outcomes → · Compare public agreements →
Public-source factual research only. No legal, fairness, fiduciary, accounting or investment opinion.
Board / CFO review pathSee $4,900 / 72-hour scope